ROUSE v. ROUSE

No. 90-02635.

595 So.2d 1013 (1992)

Louise ROUSE, Appellant, v. Earl D. ROUSE, Appellee.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

March 6, 1992.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David M. Wall, Clearwater, for appellant.

M. Katherine Ramers of Boyer and Koch, P.A., Dunedin, for appellee.


CAMPBELL, Judge.

In this dissolution action, appellant/wife has raised numerous points on appeal, only one of which need be discussed.

Wife argues that the trial court's order requiring the parties to refrain from any type of harassment is so vague and unclear that it is not enforceable by contempt. The law provides that a party cannot be held in contempt for violating an order that does not sufficiently apprise him of what he is required to do. Loury v...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases