HOLMES, J.
The single issue presented in this case is whether appellant could assert his motion to suppress at a pretrial state. For the reasons that follow, we answer such query in the affirmative.
Both parties to this action have asserted that the court of appeals' interpretation of the motion to suppress in this case was too narrow. Crim.R. 12(B) provides, with respect to pretrial motions to suppress, that:
"Any defense, objection, or request which...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
