1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 982 F.2d
  5. 982 F.2d 494 (1992)
 

SINSKEY v. PHARMACIA OPHTHALMICS, INC.

No. 92-1216.

982 F.2d 494 (1992)

Robert M. SINSKEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PHARMACIA OPHTHALMICS, INC., Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

December 28, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ronald W. Reagin, Blakely, Sokoloff, Taylor & Zafman, of Los Angeles, CA, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief was Stephen D. Gross.

David J. Oldenkamp, Poms, Smith, Lande & Rose, of Los Angeles, CA, argued for defendant-appellee. With him on the brief were William Poms and Brian W. Kasell. Also on the brief was Robert Stier, Jr., Bernstein, Shur, Sawyer & Nelson, of Portland, ME.

Before ARCHER, MAYER and MICHEL, Circuit Judges.

MAYER, Circuit Judge.

Robert M. Sinskey appeals the judgment of the United States District Court for the Central District of California holding that United States Patent No. 4,601,720 is invalid under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b). Because we agree with the district court that Sinskey has not raised a genuine issue as to any material fact and that Pharmacia Ophthalmics, Inc. is entitled to judgment as a matter of law, we affirm.

BACKGROUND

Dr. Robert M...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases