STATE EX REL. OKL. BAR ASS'N v. ARMSTRONG

SCBD No. 3600.

848 P.2d 538 (1992)

STATE of Oklahoma, ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION, Complainant, v. Richard V. ARMSTRONG, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

May 26, 1992.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Dan Murdock, Oklahoma City, for complainant.

Fred P. Gilbert, Brewster, Shallcross & Rizley, Tulsa, for respondent.


SUMMERS, Justice.

The lawyer was convicted of Driving While Under the Influence of Intoxicating Liquor, Second Offense, and the Bar sought suspension under Rule 7, Rules Governing Disciplinary Proceedings. 5 O.S. 1981 Ch. 1, App. 1-A. The lawyer objected. In State ex rel. Oklahoma Bar Association v. Armstrong, 791 P.2d 815 (Okla. 1990) we examined the subject of suspension under Rule 7, and remanded the matter to the Trial...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases