1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 978 F.2d
  5. 978 F.2d 395 (1992)
 

FRIEBURG FARM EQUIPMENT INC. v. VAN DALE, INC.

No. 91-1510.

978 F.2d 395 (1992)

FRIEBURG FARM EQUIPMENT, INCORPORATED, a Wisconsin corporation, Frieburg Farm Equipment, a Wisconsin partnership, Harold R. Frieburg, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. VAN DALE, INCORPORATED, a Minnesota corporation, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Decided October 29, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James F. Gebhart, H. Dale Peterson (argued), Stroud, Stroud, Willink, Thompson & Howard, Madison, Wis., for plaintiffs-appellees.

Edwin J. Hughes (argued), Ted Waskowski, Stafford, Rosenbaum, Rieser & Hansen, Madison, Wis., for defendant-appellant.

Before FLAUM and RIPPLE, Circuit Judges, and ESCHBACH, Senior Circuit Judge.

FLAUM, Circuit Judge.

Frieburg Farm Equipment, Inc., and related parties (collectively "Frieburg") brought this diversity suit against Van Dale, Inc., under the Wisconsin Fair Dealership Law (WFDL) and state common law. The district court, on cross motions for summary judgment, held that Frieburg met the statutory definition of "dealer," and hence could proceed with its WFDL count. At the same time, the court granted Van Dale summary judgment on all other counts,...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases