This case presents the question whether the "prison-delivery" rule remains viable in California. The rule provides that a prisoner's notice of appeal is deemed timely filed if delivered to prison authorities within the 60-day filing period set forth in rule 31(a) of the California Rules
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
IN RE JORDAN
4 Cal.4th 116 (1992)
840 P.2d 983
13 Cal. Rptr.2d 878
In re GARY WALTER JORDAN on Habeas Corpus.
Supreme Court of California.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
December 7, 1992.
December 7, 1992.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Quin Denvir, under appointment by the Supreme Court, for Petitioner.
Daniel E. Lungren, Attorney General, George Williamson, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Gary W. Schons, Assistant Attorney General, David I. Friedenberg and Robert M. Foster, Deputy Attorneys General, for Respondent.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.