1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 968 F.2d
  5. 968 F.2d 232 (1992)
 

U.S. v. CAMING

No. 1569, Docket 92-1043.

968 F.2d 232 (1992)

UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Stanley CAMING, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Decided June 29, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David A. Cutner, New York City (Clifford A. Rathkopf, Jr. and Debra I. Harris, of counsel), for defendant-appellant Stanley Caming.

Robert E. Rice, Asst. U.S. Atty., S.D.N.Y., New York City (Otto G. Obermaier, U.S. Atty., Bruce G. Ohr and Michele Hirshman, Asst. U.S. Attys., of counsel), for appellee U.S.

Before: PRATT, FRIEDMAN, and ALTIMARI, Circuit Judges.

FRIEDMAN, Circuit Judge:

In this appeal from his conviction for structuring currency transactions, the appellant contends that the district court erroneously (1) denied his pretrial motion to suppress evidence, (2) denied him a fair trial through certain evidentiary rulings, (3) instructed the jury concerning an element of the offense, and (4) calculated his sentence under the Sentencing Guidelines. We reject all these contentions and affirm the conviction and sentence...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases