Judgment unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum:
On appeal from her conviction for attempted criminal possession of marihuana in the first degree, defendant's primary contention is that the evidence is legally insufficient. Assuming that the proof against defendant was wholly circumstantial, we conclude that it was sufficient to rule out all reasonable hypotheses of innocence and to establish defendant's guilt to a moral certainty (see, People v Way
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.