Judgment unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum:
There is no evidence in the record of the suppression hearing to show that defendant's arraignment was delayed for the purpose of depriving defendant of his right to counsel. Defendant is not entitled to a new hearing to present additional evidence, having had the opportunity at the first hearing to litigate that issue (see, People v Cofresi,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.