1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 65 Ohio
  5. 65 Ohio St.3d 45 (1992)
 

STATE EX REL. WHITE v. FRANKLIN CTY. BD. OF ELECTIONS

No. 92-1809.

65 Ohio St.3d 45 (1992)

THE STATE EX REL. WHITE ET AL. v. FRANKLIN COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS ET AL.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided October 2, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Donald J. McTigue, for relators.

Michael Miller, Prosecuting Attorney, and Harland H. Hale, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for respondents Franklin County Board of Elections and its members.

Lee I. Fisher, Attorney General, and Cherry Lynne Poteet, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent Secretary of State.

Chester, Hoffman, Willcox & Saxbe and Donald C. Brey, for respondent Joseph W. Testa.

Per Curiam.

Relators argue that the Secretary of State and board of elections abused their discretion and disregarded the law, such that writs of prohibition and mandamus should issue to overturn their decisions, which are otherwise final. State ex rel. Higgins v. Brown (1960), 170 Ohio St. 511, 11 O.O.2d 322, 166 N.E.2d 759, paragraph two of the syllabus; State ex rel. Senn v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Elections...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases