ORDER
This case came before the court for oral argument on April 8, 1992, pursuant to an order which had directed defendant to appeal and show cause why its appeal should not be summarily decided.
After considering the arguments and memoranda of counsel, we are of the opinion that cause has not been shown. We believe that the trial justice was correct in determining that defendant's sign constituted a public nuisance in violation of G.L. 1956 (1988 Reenactment...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
