Complainant, the Oklahoma Bar Association (OBA) charged respondent, Kenneth V. Todd with misconduct warranting discipline. We hold the OBA did not prove by clear and convincing evidence Todd engaged in deceitful or fraudulent conduct toward an opposing party, but the OBA did prove he engaged in deceitful or fraudulent conduct in presentation of evidence to a tribunal to obtain a default judgment. As you are aware we have offered this as a free subscription over the past years and we have now made it a paid service.Look forward to your continued patronage.NEVER MISS A DECISION. START YOUR SUBSCRIPTION.
Uncompromising quality. Enduring impact.
Your support ensures a bright future for independent legal reporting.GET STARTED
OR
Read it with your Leagle account.
Sign in to
continue
STATE EX REL. OKLAHOMA BAR ASS'N v. TODD
SCBD No. 3733.
833 P.2d 260 (1992)
STATE of Oklahoma, ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION, Complainant, v. Kenneth V. TODD, Respondent.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
June 9, 1992.
June 9, 1992.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Gloria Miller White, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Oklahoma Bar Ass'n, Oklahoma City, for complainant.
Robert G. Green, Tulsa, for respondent.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
