PEOPLE v. ANDERSON

Nos. 71877 to 71888.

591 N.E.2d 461 (1992)

148 Ill.2d 15

169 Ill.Dec. 288

The PEOPLE of the State of Illinois, Appellant, v. Marc R. ANDERSON, Appellee. The PEOPLE of the State of Illinois, Appellant, v. John W. BILENKO, Appellee. The PEOPLE of the State of Illinois, Appellant, v. James A. BOYER, Appellee. The PEOPLE of the State of Illinois, Appellant, v. David J. CAREY, Appellee. The PEOPLE of the State of Illinois, Appellant, v. Brian D. DONCHEZ, Appellee. The PEOPLE of the State of Illinois, Appellant, v. Raymond A. DREW, Appellee. The PEOPLE of the State of Illinois, Appellant, v. Steve C. KADLEC, Appellee. The PEOPLE of the State of Illinois, Appellant, v. Anthony F. KOLOVITZ, Appellee. The PEOPLE of the State of Illinois, Appellant, v. Chris (C.K.) McCRACKEN, Appellee. The PEOPLE of the State of Illinois, Appellant, v. Mark T. MOLZER, Appellee. The PEOPLE of the State of Illinois, Appellant, v. Scott A. ROKITA, Appellee. The PEOPLE of the State of Illinois, Appellant, v. Rian P. SANDERS, Appellee.

Supreme Court of Illinois.

April 16, 1992.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Roland W. Burris, Atty. Gen., Springfield (Rosalyn Kaplan, Sol. Gen., and Terence M. Madsen and Douglas K. Smith, Asst. Attys. Gen., of counsel), for People.

Gayle Tronvig Carpter, Macomb, for appellee Marc R. Anderson.

James P. O'Malley, Oak Park, for appellee John W. Bilenko.

James A. Trannell, Dubuque, Iowa, for appellee James Boyer.

Arthur J. Inman, Peoria, for appellee David J. Carey.

Thomas J. Royce, Chicago, for appellee Brian D. Donchez.

Michael L. Neff, Macomb, for appellee Raymond A. Drew.

No appearance for appellee Steve C. Kadlec.

Thomas C. Brandstrader, of Mt. Prospect, for appellee Anthony F. Kolovitz.

James Patrick Murphy, Macomb, for appellee Chris (C.K.) McCracken.

H. Wayne Statham, Galesburg, for appellee Mark T. Molzer.

Joseph C. O'Donnell, Macomb, for appellee Scott A. Rokita.

Dean A. Stone, Macomb, for appellee Rian P. Sanders.


Chief Justice MILLER delivered the opinion of the court:

Defendants were charged by information with the offense of hazing (Ill.Rev.Stat. 1989, ch. 144, par. 221). The trial judge dismissed the charges, ruling the hazing statute to be unconstitutionally overbroad and vague. The State now appeals directly to this court pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 302(a) (134 Ill.2d R. 302(a)). We find the hazing statute to be constitutional...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases