MATTER OF NN. v. OO.


187 A.D.2d 860 (1992)

In the Matter of Helen NN., Respondent, v. Daniel OO., Appellant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Third Department.

November 12, 1992


Initially, we note that respondent failed to object to the admission into evidence of the human leucocyte antigen (hereinafter HLA) blood test and, therefore, he cannot now challenge Family Court's review of the test results (see, Matter of Kimiecik v Daryl E., 92 A.D.2d 1063). In any event, we reject respondent's contention that the HLA test was introduced without proper foundation. The results were properly certified in...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases