CITY OF MOORPARK, Plaintiff and Respondent,
v.
MOORPARK UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT et al., Defendants and Appellants.
Supreme Court of California.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
December 5, 1991.
December 5, 1991.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
COUNSEL
Bergman & Wedner, Gregory M. Bergman, Richard V. Godino and Robert M. Mason III for Defendants and Appellants. Bowie, Arneson, Kadi & Dixon, Carol J. Graham, Wendy H. Wiles, Ronald D. Wenkart, Claire Y. Morey, Geraldine Jaffe and Val R. Fadely as Amici Curiae on behalf of Defendants and Appellants.
Cheryl J. Kane, City Attorney, Burke, Williams & Sorenson, Lisa E. Kranitz and Peter D. Tremblay for Plaintiff and Respondent.
Stephanie Scher, City Attorney (La Canada-Flintridge), Brown, Winfield & Canzoneri and Virginia R. Pesola as Amici Curiae on behalf of Plaintiff and Respondent.
Supreme Court of California.
OPINION
LUCAS, C.J.
In this case we construe for the first time the Naylor Act (Ed. Code, §§ 39390-39404;1 hereafter the Act), which governs the disposal of certain kinds of surplus school property. The City of Moorpark (hereafter City) petitioned the superior court for a writ of mandate to compel the Moorpark Unified School District (hereafter District) to transfer school property, pursuant...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
