STATE v. MEADO

No. 90-2232-CR.

163 Wis.2d 789 (1991)

472 N.W.2d 567

STATE of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Robert W. MEADO, Defendant-Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin.

Decided June 12, 1991.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

On behalf of the defendant-appellant, the cause was submitted on the briefs of Bradley J. Bloch of Jastroch & LaBarge, S.C. of Waukesha.

On behalf of the plaintiff-respondent, the cause was submitted on the brief of James E. Doyle, attorney general and Jerome S. Schmidt, assistant attorney general.

Before Nettesheim, P.J., Scott and Anderson, JJ.


ANDERSON, J.

Robert W. Meado appeals from judgments of conviction and an order denying postconviction relief. The trial court found Meado guilty after he entered a no contest plea to theft by false representation, contrary to sec. 943.20(1)(d), Stats. Meado stipulated to use the information in the complaint to establish the factual basis for his plea. On appeal, Meado claims that the information contained in the complaint failed to establish a factual basis for the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases