1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 252 N.J.
  5. 252 N.J. Super. 635 (1991)
 

BERRIE v. BERRIE

252 N.J. Super. 635 (1991)

600 A.2d 512

UNI BERRIE, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. RUSSELL BERRIE, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided December 31, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joel D. Siegal argued the cause for appellant (Hellring, Lindeman, Goldstein & Siegal, attorneys; Joel D. Siegal, Ronny J.G. Siegal and Sheryl E. Koomer, on the brief).

Frederic K. Becker argued the cause for respondent (Wilentz, Goldman & Spitzer, attorneys; Frederic K. Becker, David M. Wildstein, Frederick J. Dennehy, Christine D. Petruzzell, and Douglas K. Schoenberg, on the brief).

Before Judges DREIER, GRUCCIO and BROCHIN.

The opinion of the court was delivered by DREIER, J.A.D.

Plaintiff, Uni Berrie, appeals by leave granted from interlocutory rulings in favor of her husband, Russell Berrie, by two trial judges. The orders were entered on December 20, 1990 and January 31, 1991. In response to defendant's successful in limine motion, the initial trial judge ruled in the December 20, 1990 order:

This court rules in limine that a premarital period of cohabitation...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases