1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 170 A.D.2d
  5. 170 A.D.2d 691 (1991)
 

PEOPLE v. DOUGLAS

170 A.D.2d 691 (1991)

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Charlton Douglas, Appellant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

February 25, 1991

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant contends that the identification testimony of the complaining witness was tainted by a suggestive joint-viewing of a photographic array and by a suggestive lineup. We disagree.

In cases where the defendant and the complainant are known to one another "`suggestiveness' is not a concern" (People v Gissendanner, 48 N.Y.2d 543, 552; see, People v Tas,...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases