HERNANDEZ v. NEW YORK

No. 89-7645.

500 U.S. 352 (1991)

HERNANDEZ v. NEW YORK

Supreme Court of the United States.

Decided May 28, 1991.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kenneth Kimerling argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were Ruben Franco and Arthur Baer.

Jay M. Cohen argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Charles J. Hynes, Peter A. Weinstein, Carol Teague Schwartzkopf, and Victor Barall.*


JUSTICE KENNEDY announced the judgment of the Court and delivered an opinion, in which THE CHIEF JUSTICE, JUSTICE WHITE and JUSTICE SOUTER join.

Petitioner Dionisio Hernandez asks us to review the New York state courts' rejection of his claim that the prosecutor in his criminal trial exercised peremptory challenges to exclude Latinos from the jury by reason of their ethnicity. If true, the prosecutor's discriminatory use...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases