AQN ASSOCIATES, INC. v. FLORENCE TP.


248 N.J. Super. 597 (1991)

591 A.2d 995

AQN ASSOCIATES, INC., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. TOWNSHIP OF FLORENCE AND THE MAYOR AND TOWNSHIP COUNCIL OF THE TOWNSHIP OF FLORENCE, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided June 7, 1991.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William J. Wolf argued the cause for appellant (Bathgate, Wegener, Dugan, Wouters, Neumann & Wolf, attorneys; William J. Wolf, of counsel; William R. Mayer, Howard P. Lakind and Michael M. DiCicco, on the brief).

Michael D. Matteo argued the cause for respondents (Montgomery, McCracken, Walker & Rhoads, attorneys; Michael D. Matteo, of counsel; Ramiro M. Carbonell, on the brief).

Before Judges SHEBELL, HAVEY and SKILLMAN.


The opinion of the court was delivered by SHEBELL, J.A.D.

Plaintiff, AQN Associates, Inc. (AQN), appeals contesting grants of summary judgment dismissing its complaints that sought to invalidate bond ordinances adopted by the Township of Florence (Florence). The bonds were to finance Florence's obligation to the Township of Pemberton (Pemberton). The obligation arose out of a Regional Contribution Agreement (RCA) between...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases