RAY v. NAMPA SCHOOL DIST. NO. 131

No. 18196.

814 P.2d 17 (1991)

120 Idaho 117

Thomas M. RAY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NAMPA SCHOOL DISTRICT # 131, a body corporate and politic of the State of Idaho; Stevenson Youngerman, individually and in his official capacity as the Superintendent of Schools, Nampa School District # 131; Bill Barnard and Russ Brummett each individually and in his official capacity as an employee or agent of the Nampa School District # 131, Defendants-Respondents.

Supreme Court of Idaho, Boise, December 1990 Term.

June 12, 1991.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Brian N. Donesley, Boise, for plaintiff-appellant.

Imhoff & Lynch, Boise, for defendants-respondents. James B. Lynch, argued.


BOYLE, Justice.

In this case we are called upon to determine whether Thomas Ray had an employment contract with the Nampa School District and whether his due process rights were violated when his employment as a maintenance electrician with the School District was terminated.

FACTS

Appellant Ray was hired on May 21, 1984 by the School District as a maintenance electrician. He was given a Maintenance Employee's Handbook of Employment Conditions and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases