Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.
The defendant's possession of a weapon on the day it was used to shoot the complainant, and his possession of another weapon on the day he was arrested, constituted two separate acts, and therefore the Supreme Court could properly impose consecutive sentences for each act (see, People v Day,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.