Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
There is no merit to the defendant's contention that the evidence adduced at trial was legally insufficient to establish his guilt of the crimes charged because the evidence consisted of uncorroborated accomplice testimony (see, CPL 60.22 [1]). The accomplice's testimony was sufficiently corroborated by the testimony of the complainant, who identified the defendant as one of the perpetrators (see, e.g., People...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.