SEC. PAC. v. PEAT MARWICK


165 A.D.2d 622 (1991)

Security Pacific Business Credit, Inc., Appellant, v. Peat Marwick Main & Co., as Successor to Main Hurdman et al., Respondent

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

April 30, 1991


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gabriel B. Schwartz of counsel (Anthony C. Acampora with him on the brief; Hahn & Hessen, attorneys), for appellant.

Mathias E. Mone of counsel (Jonathan D. Thier, Timothy R. Dodson, Louis P. Novello and Claudia L. Taft with him on the brief; Cahill Gordon & Reindel, attorneys), for respondent.

MILONAS and ELLERIN, JJ., concur with KUPFERMAN, J.; CARRO, J. P., and RUBIN, J., dissent in a separate opinion by CARRO, J. P.


KUPFERMAN, J.

We start as we must, as did the IAS court, with the analysis in Credit Alliance Corp. v Andersen & Co. (65 N.Y.2d 536, 551): "Before accountants may be held liable in negligence to noncontractual parties who rely to their detriment on inaccurate financial reports, certain prerequisites must be satisfied: (1) the accountants must have been aware that...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases