1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 173 A.D.2d
  5. 173 A.D.2d 583 (1991)
 

ADOLPHE v. RAMIREZ

173 A.D.2d 583 (1991)

Jean Adolphe et al., Appellants, et al., Plaintiff, v. Raul Ramirez, et al., Respondents

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

May 20, 1991

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs to the respondent Raul Ramirez.

The record supports the Supreme Court's determination that the affirmations of the appellants' physicians consisted of conclusory allegations based on subjective complaints of pain. The mere repetition of the word "permanent" in the affidavits of a plaintiff or a treating physician does not suffice to establish serious injury within the meaning...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases