INDUS. DEV. ASSOC. v. F.T.P., INC.


248 N.J. Super. 468 (1991)

591 A.2d 682

INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATES A/K/A INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION, A NEW JERSEY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. F.T.P., INC., A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT, AND COMMERCIAL UNION SURPLUS LINES INSURANCE COMPANY, A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE; EXECUTIVE EXCESS LTD.; ANTONIO SUAREZ D/B/A I.C.P.; ASSOCIATED FINANCIAL SERVICES, A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION; P.P.G., INDUSTRIES, INC., A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA AND PUGLIESE SWIMMING POOLS CORPORATION, A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, DEFENDANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided May 31, 1991.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Glenn A. Bergenfield argued the cause for appellant (Michael F. Chazkel, attorney and on the brief).

Robert H. Tell argued the cause for respondent, attorney for respondent (Lynch, Martin & Philibosian, attorneys).

Before Judges MICHELS, GRUCCIO and D'ANNUNZIO.


The opinion of the court was delivered by GRUCCIO, J.A.D.

Following our remand pursuant to our decision in Industrial Development Assoc. v. Commercial Union, 222 N.J.Super. 281, 536 A.2d 787 (App.Div. 1988), plaintiff Industrial Development Association (I.D.A.) appeals from the decision of the trial court granting defendant F.T.P., Inc.'s (F.T.P.) motion for judgment notwithstanding...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases