GRASSIS v. JOHNS-MANVILLE CORP.


248 N.J. Super. 446 (1991)

591 A.2d 671

DULIO GRASSIS, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS, AND WILLIAM GASKO AND MARIE GASKO, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. JOHNS-MANVILLE CORP., ET AL., DEFENDANTS, AND THE CELOTEX CORPORATION AND GAF CORPORATION, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS CROSS-APPELLANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided May 30, 1991.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Clifford N. Kuhn, Jr. argued the cause for appellants (Rubin, Rubin, Malgran & Kuhn, attorneys; Clifford N. Kuhn, on the brief).

Gita F. Rothchild argued the cause for respondents/cross-appellants (McCarter & English, attorneys; Michael A. Tanenbaum, of counsel; John C. Garde and Rosanne C. Kemmet, on the brief).

Before Judges J.H. COLEMAN, DREIER and LANDAU.


The opinion of the court was delivered by DREIER, J.A.D.

Plaintiffs William Gasko and Marie Gasko have appealed, and defendants The Celotex Corporation and GAF Corporation were granted leave to cross-appeal. Plaintiffs appeal from the summary judgment dismissing the complaint, and defendants from an earlier grant of remittitur and denial of their motion for judgment n.o.v.

For a 15-year period from 1951 to 1966, plaintiff William Gasko was employed by Goetze...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases