Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
On July 26, 1988, the plaintiffs' attorney mailed a copy of the summons and complaint to the attorney for the defendants-respondents, and the latter attorney admitted that he "accepted service * * * on behalf of" his clients. However, the record is devoid of any evidence that the defendants-respondents had in fact authorized their attorney to accept process on their behalf. We agree with the Supreme Court that the mailing...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
