CUNNINGHAM v. STATE

Nos. 26175-4-I; 26002-2-I.

61 Wn. App. 562 (1991)

811 P.2d 225

CHESTER D. CUNNINGHAM, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, ET AL, Defendants, MANZA, MOCERI, GUSTAFSON & MESSINA, P.S., Respondent.

The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division One.

June 10, 1991.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mark J. Dynan, for appellant.

Mark P. Scheer, Charles C. Huber, and Lane Powell Spears Lubersky, for respondent.


AGID, J.

Chester D. Cunningham appeals two summary judgment orders under which the court dismissed all of his claims against the Manza, Moceri, Gustafson & Messina (Manza Moceri) law firm. He contends that the trial court erred in giving preclusive effect to a partial summary judgment order entered in a related federal district court action, and in ruling as a matter of law that there were no genuine issues of material...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases