ERSA GRAE CORP. v. FLUOR CORP.

Docket No. B052885.

1 Cal.App.4th 613 (1991)

2 Cal. Rptr.2d 288

ERSA GRAE CORPORATION, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. FLUOR CORPORATION, Defendant and Appellant.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division One.

December 5, 1991.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

McCambridge, Deixler, Marmaro & Goldberg, Bert H. Deixler, Shinaan S. Krakowsky and Lary Alan Rappaport for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe, Richard J. Lucas, James A. Hughes, W. Douglas Kari and Stephen E. Whittaker for Defendant and Appellant.


OPINION

VOGEL, J.

Ersa Grae Corporation sued Fluor Corporation for damages for breach of a contract to transfer real property to Ersa Grae. Fluor defended by asserting, among other things, that no contract was formed because all offers had been revoked before Ersa Grae accepted. In a bifurcated trial, a jury found the parties had an enforceable contract and, thereafter, a second jury awarded $13 million to Ersa Grae. Following a series...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases