1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 170 A.D.2d
  5. 170 A.D.2d 416 (1991)
 

SWISKEY v. LAMOTTA

170 A.D.2d 416 (1991)

Jacqueline Swiskey et al., Appellants, v. Guy Lamotta, Respondent

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

February 28, 1991

Over two-thirds of the requests set forth in plaintiffs' "First Notice to Produce" are palpably overbroad or well beyond the scope of permissible discovery. In such a case, it is not the court's responsibility to prune the offensive document, and plaintiffs' notice was properly vacated in its entirety (Bohlen Capital Holdings v Standard Coal Co., 90 A.D.2d 476).

We find plaintiffs' remaining arguments to be without merit...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases