SANCHEZ v. MANHATTAN & BRONX SURFACE TRANSIT OPERATING AUTH.


170 A.D.2d 402 (1991)

Romeo Sanchez et al., Appellants, v. Manhattan and Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority, Respondent

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

February 28, 1991


The cumulative effect of improperly admitted hearsay evidence and improper assertions by counsel for MABSTOA was so prejudicial to plaintiff as to warrant a new trial.

It was the contention of plaintiff Romeo Sanchez ("Sanchez") that while attempting to board a MABSTOA bus, on February 9, 1983 at about 8:30 P.M., the bus doors closed on his foot and dragged him about fifteen feet along the ground until his foot was freed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases