1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 173 A.D.2d
  5. 173 A.D.2d 334 (1991)
 

SCHWARTZ v. STECHER JAGLOM & PRUTZMAN

173 A.D.2d 334 (1991)

Bart Schwartz, Appellant, v. Stecher Jaglom & Prutzman et al., Respondents Bart Schwartz et al., Appellants, v. Stecher Jaglom & Prutzman et al., Respondents

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

May 21, 1991

Plaintiffs' attack on counsel's participation in the special masters program was wholly unwarranted. There is no evidence that counsel participated as a special master in any litigation remotely related to the cases at bar. Such volunteer assistance to the court does not constitute a conflict of interest which might preclude practice before the same court.

There was insufficient "new" evidence to warrant amendment of the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases