1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 170 A.D.2d
  5. 170 A.D.2d 310 (1991)
 

PEOPLE v. NEWSOME

170 A.D.2d 310 (1991)

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Anthony Newsome, Appellant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

February 19, 1991

Testimony by the arresting officer that defendant was "hyper" and "drooling" at the time of his arrest did not circumvent the court's Sandoval ruling barring the prosecutor from inquiring into defendant's use of crack. A present sense impression does not fall under the strictures of a Sandoval ruling, nor did the terms in and of themselves violate the court's subsequent refusal to allow inquiry into the defendant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases