Petitioner was found to have accepted food and soft drinks from the operators of a diner without paying for them. The Hearing Officer's finding that the petitioner's testimony was not credible, in conjunction with the testimony of disinterested investigators of the Internal Affairs Division, constituted substantial evidence in support of the determination of guilt. (Matter of Berenhaus v Ward,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.