The trial court properly exercised its discretion in denying the defendant's application at sentencing to withdraw his previously entered pleas of guilty based on his misunderstanding of the difference between concurrent and consecutive sentences. The sentencing court kept the promises it made at the time it accepted a plea of guilty. The record reveals the defendant's pleas were made intelligently, knowingly and voluntarily (People v Harris,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
