1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 939 F.2d
  5. 939 F.2d 1533 (1991)
 

LAITRAM CORP. v. REXNORD, INC.

Nos. 90-1360, 90-1384.

939 F.2d 1533 (1991)

The LAITRAM CORPORATION and Intralox, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. REXNORD, INC., Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Rehearing Denied September 9, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Paul J. Hayes of Weingarten, Schurgin, Gagnebin & Hayes, Boston, Mass., argued for plaintiffs-appellees. With him on the brief was Victor B. Lebovici.

Kenneth E. Payne of Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, Washington, D.C., argued for defendant-appellant. With him on the brief was Dirk D. Thomas.

Before NIES, Chief Judge, and RICH and CLEVENGER, Circuit Judges.

Rehearing Denied in No. 90-1360 September 9, 1991.

NIES, Chief Judge.

Rexnord, Inc., appeals the judgment of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin (Warren, J.) that claims 21 and 22 of U.S. Patent No. 4,051,949 ('949), assigned to Laitram Corp., were infringed by Rexnord. Laitram Corp. v. Rexnord, Inc., 15 USPQ2d 1161 (E.D.Wis.1990). Laitram and Intralox1 (hereinafter collectively referred...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases