OHLHOFF v. OHLHOFF


246 N.J. Super. 1 (1991)

586 A.2d 839

HENRY JAMES OHLHOFF, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. MARY ANN OHLHOFF, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided February 4, 1991.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jack S. Zakim, for appellant.

Rupp & Ten Hoeve, for respondent (John E. Ten Hoeve, Jr., on the brief).

Before Judges GAULKIN, HAVEY and SKILLMAN.


The opinion of the court was delivered by SKILLMAN, J.A.D.

The primary issue presented by this appeal is whether N.J.S.A. 2A:17-56.23a, which bars any retroactive modification of child support, is applicable with respect to child support payments which accrue during a period when a supported child is residing with the supporting parent.

The parties were divorced on May 26, 1982. The judgment of divorce incorporated by reference a settlement agreement...

NEVER MISS A DECISION. START YOUR SUBSCRIPTION.

Uncompromising quality. Enduring impact.
Your support ensures a bright future for independent legal reporting.

As you are aware we have offered this as a free subscription over the past years and we have now made it a paid service.Look forward to your continued patronage.

GET STARTED


OR

Read it with your Leagle account.
Sign in to continue


Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases