1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 928 F.2d
  5. 928 F.2d 1471 (1991)
 

KOCH v. HANKINS

No. 89-16005.

928 F.2d 1471 (1991)

Floyd KOCH; Janice Koch; William D. Lowe; Phyllis Lowe; Colin Wong; Mark Burr; Suzanne Borges; Herman Duran; Walter Hashimoto; Shoge Kimura; Hercules Fini, Damien Chang, Ken Takeda, Bill Parrish, Ken Kemp, James Fong, Yui Yee Fong, F. Allen Whitaker, Bob Lugg, Joe Kimura, Beverly Chinn, Harold Chew, Ken Lee, Charles DiBari, Russell DeBari, Richard Plash, Eddon Duran, Rock Koch, J. William Bace, Don Nusbaum, J. Warren Davis, Larry Peterson, Barbara Peterson, George Riley, Harold Hester, Patricia Hester, Jack Isaacs, Robert Chisholm, Forrest Chioppa, Roy Fong, Alan Joe, Virginia Joe, Henry Nigro, James Ford, James Chen, Robert Lee, James Lau, Morris Fowler, Kay Haa, Chris Hara, Frank Ducato, Winston Lee, Allen Tusting, Marcia Tusting, Enrique Agorio, Inger Agorio, Lilia Buck, Stephen Buck, Ue Ching Ow, Pat Ow, Edward Chan, Pat Chan, Pak Tong Yee, Marshall I. Rothstein, Francoise Rothstein, Tom Drake, F.K. Chin, Sandra Chin, Hayden Evans, Arlene Evans, Phillip Lucas, William Jagger, Delores Jagger, Howard Schwat, Robert I. Longstreth, Barbara J. Longstreth, Jerry Vonder Ahe, William Wong, Doreen Wong, Carl Chen, Ben Hara, Helen Hara, Blair Anderson, John Dailley, Sarah Dailley, Fred Drew, Ruth Drew, Terry Kessler, Leland Smith, Helene Smith, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Edward J. HANKINS; Robert Chew; Beverly A. Chew; Rodney Chew; Linda A. Chew; Audrey A. Hankins; Carla Patterson; Terry J. Hankins; Bradley L. Hankins; Kerdie J. Hawks; Dean K. Hawks; Rodlin Enterprises, Inc., Carlon Properties, Inc., Kean Financial Corp., Buckingham Financial Corp., Sentinel Financial Corp., Citadel Financial Corp.; Johnson, Hankins, MacDonald, Kimball & Co., Glen MacDonald, Richard C. Clews, Don Kimball, Maxus Management Group, Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided March 21, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Andrew Wilson, Wilson, Ryan & Campilongo, San Francisco, Cal., for plaintiffs-appellants.

Montie S. Day, Day Law Corp., Oakland, Cal., for defendants-appellees.

Before CHOY, TANG and FLETCHER, JJ.

OPINION

FLETCHER, Circuit Judge:

The plaintiff-investors ("investors") appeal from the district court's summary judgment that the investments did not constitute securities within the meaning of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. § 78j(b). The investors likewise seek to appeal the district court's denial of their motion for reconsideration of the summary judgment order in light of Hocking v. Dubois, 885 F.2d 1449

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases