1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 937 F.2d
  5. 937 F.2d 1310 (1991)
 

ARTHUR YOUNG & CO. v. REVES

Nos. 87-1726WA, 87-1727WA, 87-1803WA, 87-2533WA and 88-1014WA.

937 F.2d 1310 (1991)

ARTHUR YOUNG & CO., Appellant, v. Bob REVES; Robert H. Gibbs; & Frances Graham, Appellees. Thomas E. ROBERTSON, Jr., As Trustee of the Farmer's Co-op of Arkansas and Oklahoma, Inc., and as representative of a class of members, depositors, and equity security holders, who are similarly situated to him; Bob Reves; Frances Graham; Robert H. Gibbs, individually; Robert H. Gibbs, as natural guardian of his minor children, Thomas A. Gibbs and Robert H. Gibbs, Jr.; and Robert H. Gibbs, as Trustee of the Muskogee Internal Medicine Group Profit Sharing Funds, Appellants, v. ARTHUR YOUNG & CO., Appellee. Thomas E. ROBERTSON, Jr., As Trustee of the Farmer's Co-op of Arkansas and Oklahoma, Inc., and as representative of a class of members, depositors, and equity security holders, who are similarly situated to him, Appellees, v. ARTHUR YOUNG & CO., Appellant. Thomas E. ROBERTSON, Jr., etc., et al. v. Jack WHITE, et al. Thomas E. ROBERTSON, Jr., As Trustee of the Farmer's Co-op of Arkansas and Oklahoma, Inc., and as representative of a class of members, depositors, and equity security holders, who are similarly situated to him; Bob Reves; Frances Graham; Robert H. Gibbs, individually; Robert H. Gibbs, as natural guardian of his minor children, Thomas A. Gibbs and Robert H. Gibbs, Jr.; and Robert H. Gibbs, as Trustee of the Muskogee Internal Medicine Group Profit Sharing Funds, Appellees, v. ARTHUR YOUNG & CO., Appellant. Thomas E. ROBERTSON, Jr., etc., et al. v. Jack WHITE, et al. Robert R. CLOAR, Class Counsel, Appellant, v. Bob REVES, Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Decided June 27, 1991.

Rehearing Denied August 29, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John Matson, New York City, argued (Kathryn A. Oberly, Washington D.C., Fred Lovitch, Kansas City, Mo., and Carl D. Liggio and John Matson, New York City, on brief), for appellant.

John R. McCambridge, Chicago, Ill., argued (Jay R. Hoffman, Chicago, Ill., and Robert R. Cloar, Fort Smith, Ark., on brief), for appellee.

Before FAGG and MAGILL, Circuit Judges, and SNEED, Senior Circuit Judge.

MAGILL, Circuit Judge.

I.   BACKGROUND .................................................... 1314
     A. The Co-op .................................................. 1315
     B. The Gasohol Plant .......................................... 1315
     C. The 1981 Audit ............................................. 1316
     D. The 1981 Audit Report to the Board ......................... 1318
     E. The 1982 Annual Meeting ....................................

                    
                    
                    

                        

                            

                                
                            

                            

                                

                                    
    
                                        
  1. 
                                        
  2. 
                                        
  3. 
                                    

                                

                                

                                    
Let's get started

                                

                                

                                    

                                    Leagle.com
                                    

                                    Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting 
                                    

                                        Sign on now to see your case. 
                                        

                                        Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
                                        

                                        
    
                                            
  • Updated daily.
    • 
                                            
  • Uncompromising quality.
    • 
                                            
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.
    •

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases