EXXON CHEMICAL PATENTS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
The LUBRIZOL CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant.
United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
June 4, 1991.
June 4, 1991.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
William C. Slusser, Baker & Botts, Houston, Tex., argued for plaintiff-appellee. With him on the brief was Lee L. Kaplan. Lawrence F. Scinto, Fitzpatrick, Cella, Harper & Scinto, New York City, argued for plaintiff-appellee. With him on the brief was Nels T. Lippert. Also on the brief was Kenneth M. Bialo, New York City.
Kenneth R. Adamo, Jones, Day, Reavis & Pogue, Cleveland, Ohio, argued for defendant-appellant. With him on the brief were Regan J. Fay, Robert J. Hoerner, James L. Wamsley, III and Hal D. Cooper, of counsel.
Before NEWMAN, MICHEL, and PLAGER, Circuit Judges.
United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
PER CURIAM.
On this appeal of various district court orders granting and refusing to vacate an injunction,1 The Lubrizol Corporation raises the question of whether the United States patent in suit was validly issued on the issue date reported in the Official Gazette of the Patent and Trademark Office when on that date, and for a substantial period thereafter, the patent document was not printed, the patent grant was not signed by...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
