LOOMIS v. CITY OF HAILEY

No. 18321.

807 P.2d 1272 (1991)

119 Idaho 434

Ned LOOMIS and C.A. Grubb, suing on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Counterdefendants-Appellants, v. CITY OF HAILEY, a municipal corporation of the State of Idaho, Defendant-Counterclaimant-Respondent.

Supreme Court of Idaho, Boise, October 1990 Term.

March 21, 1991.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

E. Lee Schlender, Hailey, for plaintiffs-counterdefendants-appellants.

Hogue, Speck & Aanestad, P.A., Ketchum, for defendant-counterclaimant-respondent. J. Stephen Crabtree, argued.

Lindsay, Hart, Neil & Weigler, Boise, for amicus curiae Ass'n of Idaho Cities. Michael C. Moore, argued.


BOYLE, Justice.

In this appeal from entry of summary judgment we are required to determine whether the City of Hailey's particular system of charging an initial sewer and water connection fee of $1,800.00 under a city ordinance violates the Idaho Constitution and applicable portions of the Idaho Revenue Bond Act.

FACTS

In 1969 the voters of the City of Hailey approved a $940,000.00 revenue bond to create a more efficient and more sanitary water and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases