U.S. v. ROGAT

Nos. 90-1052, 90-1053.

924 F.2d 983 (1991)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Bruce Howard ROGAT and Margo Kay Rogat, Defendants-Appellants.

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

January 29, 1991.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Vicki Mandell-King (Michael G. Katz, Federal Public Defender, with her on the brief), Asst. Federal Public Defender, for defendants-appellants.

Kenneth R. Fimberg (Michael J. Norton, U.S. Atty., with him on the brief), Asst. U.S. Atty., for plaintiff-appellee.

Before LOGAN, and TACHA, Circuit Judges, and GREENE, District Judge.


TACHA, Circuit Judge.

Defendants-appellants Margo Kay Rogat and Bruce Howard Rogat appeal from a district court order requiring them to pay $2,449,142.48 in restitution. They contend the order constituted an abuse of discretion because the court failed to adequately consider their current indigency. We affirm.

The appellants pleaded guilty to various fraud charges. Margo Rogat pleaded guilty to four misdemeanor counts. She received a sentence of six months...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases