GROMO v. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT

No. 91-3071.

944 F.2d 882 (1991)

Louis L. GROMO, Petitioner, v. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, Respondent.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

September 19, 1991.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Louis L. Gromo, pro se.

Richard E. Rice, Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., argued for respondent. Of Counsel were David M. Cohen and Thomas W. Petersen.

Before NEWMAN and PLAGER, Circuit Judges, and MILLER, Senior Circuit Judge.


PLAGER, Circuit Judge.

"All I want is justice." With these words — not often heard so baldly stated in courts of law — Louis Gromo concluded his pro se argument. The Government had denied his petition for return of monies which were determined to be deductible, wrongfully, according to Mr. Gromo, from his monthly pension check. The Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB), although acknowledging the problems created by the Government's mishandling...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases