IN RE VAN GEUNS

No. 91-1088.

946 F.2d 845 (1991)

In re VAN GEUNS.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

October 2, 1991.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jack E. Haken, U.S. Philips Corp., of Tarrytown, N.Y., argued for appellant.

James H. Marsh, Jr., Staas & Halsey, Washington, D.C., argued for appellee. With him on the brief was James Randall Beckers.

Fred E. McKelvey, Office of the Sol., Arlington, Va., argued for amicus curiae.

Before ARCHER, PLAGER, and RADER, Circuit Judges.


ORDER

RADER, Circuit Judge.

After an interference in the Patent and Trademark Office (PTO), in which claims corresponding to the interference count were held unpatentable, Johannes R. Van Geuns appealed to this court naming Brown, the other party to the interference, as appellee. The successor in interest to Brown, the other party in the interference, filed a civil action in the United States District Court for...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases