INTEL CORP. v. U.S. INTERN. TRADE COM'N

Nos. 89-1459, 89-1476 and 89-1534.

946 F.2d 821 (1991)

INTEL CORPORATION, Appellant, v. U.S. INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION, Appellee, and Atmel Corporation, General Instrument Corporation and Microchip Technology Incorporated, Hyundai Electronics Industries Co., Ltd., and Hyundai Electronics America, Inc. and SEEQ Technology, Inc., Intervenors-Appellees. ATMEL CORPORATION, Appellant, v. U.S. INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION, Appellee, and Intel Corporation and SEEQ Technology, Inc., Intervenors-Appellees. GENERAL INSTRUMENT CORPORATION and Microchip Technology Incorporated, Appellants, v. U.S. INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION, Appellee, and Intel Corporation and SEEQ Technology, Inc., Intervenors-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Rehearing Denied October 24, 1991.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James J. Elacqua, Arnold, White & Durkee, of Houston, Tex., argued for Intel Corp., appellant in 89-1459 and intervenor-appellee in 89-1476 and 89-1534. With him on the brief were Jack C. Goldstein, Hilary E. Pearson, Timothy N. Trop, Thomas A. Miller, Danny L. Williams, Russell T. Wong, Anne E. Brookes and Richard L. Stanley. Also on the brief was Carl Silverman, Intel Corp., Santa Clara, Cal., of counsel.

Judith M. Czako, Office of the Gen. Counsel, U.S. Intern. Trade Com'n, of Washington, D.C., argued for appellee. With her on the brief were Lyn M. Schlitt, General Counsel, James A. Toupin, Asst. Gen. Counsel and John M. England, Jr.

Robert C. Morgan, Fish & Neave, of New York City, argued for Atmel Corp., appellant in 89-1476 and intervenor-appellee in 89-1459. With him on the brief were Thomas L. Secrest, Wayne M. Kennard and Gerry Ann Fifer.

Stephen B. Judlowe, Hopgood, Calimafde, Kalil, Blaustein & Judlowe, of New York City, argued for General Instrument Corp. and Microchip Technology, Inc., appellant in 89-1534 and intervenor-appellee in 89-1459. With him on the brief were Marvin N. Gordon, Brian P. Murphy and Joel Miller.

James W. Geriak and Thomas J. Morgan, Lyon & Lyon, of Los Angeles, Cal., represented SEEQ Technology, Inc., intervenor-appellee.

Philip J. Mause, Thelen, Marrin, Johnson & Bridges, of Washington, D.C., was on the brief for Hyundai Electronics Industries, intervenor-appellee.

Before ARCHER, Circuit Judge, COWEN, Senior Circuit Judge, and MAYER, Circuit Judge.


ARCHER, Circuit Judge.

Intel Corporation (Intel), Atmel Corporation (Atmel), and General Instrument Corporation and Microchip Technology Incorporated (collectively GI/M) have each filed an appeal from certain aspects1 of the Opinion (Decision) and Order, issued March 16, 1989, by the United States International Trade Commission (Commission), in Certain Erasable Programmable Read Only Memories, Components Thereof, Products Containing...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases