PARTINGTON v. GEDAN

No. 87-2375.

923 F.2d 686 (1991)

Earle A. PARTINGTON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Joseph M. GEDAN; Howard T. Chang, Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided January 11, 1991.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Earle A. Partington, Partington & Foley, Honolulu, Hawaii, pro se.

Steven S. Michaels, Deputy Atty. Gen., Honolulu, Hawaii, for defendants-appellees.

Before GOODWIN, Chief Judge, and WALLACE, HUG, SCHROEDER, POOLE, NELSON, HALL, BRUNETTI, LEAVY, FERNANDEZ, and RYMER, Circuit Judges.


Submitted En Banc January 8, 1991.*

PER CURIAM:

In part of our opinion in Partington v. Gedan, 880 F.2d 116 (9th Cir.1989) (Partington I), we imposed sanctions on Gedan and Chang. We did so based upon three prior cases which held that the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, including Rule 11, were incorporated into our Circuit Rules. 9th Cir.R. 1-1 (old Rule 5).1<...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases