1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 231 Cal.App.3d
  5. 231 Cal.App.3d 1376 (1991)
 

PEOPLE v. HERNANDEZ

Docket No. B053330.

231 Cal.App.3d 1376 (1991)

283 Cal. Rptr. 81

THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. ARMANDO HERNANDEZ, Defendant and Appellant.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Five.

June 28, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Kenneth M. Stern, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.

James K. Hahn, City Attorney, William N. Sterling and Janet G. Bogigian, Deputy City Attorneys, for Plaintiff and Respondent.

OPINION

BOREN, J.

Following a jury trial in municipal court, appellant was convicted of making telephone calls with the intent to annoy, in violation of Penal Code section 653m, subdivisions (a) and (b).1 Appellant contends both statutes are unconstitutionally overbroad because they impinge on his free speech rights, and that subdivision (a) is unconstitutionally vague as well. We transferred the case...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases