TARMANN v. STATE FARM MUT. AUTO. INS. CO.

Docket No. H006997.

2 Cal.App.4th 153 (1991)

2 Cal. Rptr.2d 861

CEIL TARMANN, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, Sixth District.

December 30, 1991.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Harry Delizonna for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Ropers, Majeski, Kohn, Bentley, Wagner & Kane, Daniel R. Kirwan and Mark Bonino for Defendant and Respondent.


OPINION

CAPACCIOLI, Acting P.J.

Statement of the Case

Plaintiff Ceil Tarmann appeals from a judgment entered after the trial court sustained without leave to amend defendant State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company's (State Farm) demurrer to Tarmann's fifth amended complaint. She claims her complaint sufficiently pled causes of action for fraud and negligent...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases