Hedayat ZOLFAGHARI, Fakr Riahi-Amini, Parviz Azmoun, Pari Azmoun, Massoud Djahanbani, Kaveh Farboud, Parvaneh Farboud, Parviz Khabir, Manijeh Khabir, Issa Malek, Amir F. Momtaz, Mohammad R. Momtaz, Shaheen Masseri, as Trustee for Nazari and Shirin Atabaki, Faradj Panahy, as Trustee for his daughter Yasmin Panahy, Lili C. Panahy, as Trustee for Nosrat Mahmoudi Chaicar, Nini Tavallali, as Trustee for Nosrat Mahmoudi Chaicar; Nini Tavallai, Jalal C. Tavallali, Plaintiffs-Appellants, and
Batool Tajbaksh, Feresteh Razaghitajbaksh, Manoucher Tajbaksh, Plaintiffs,
v.
Houshang I. SHEIKHOLESLAMI, Moore, Libowitz & Thomas, a Partnership of Richard W. Moore, Michael S. Libowitz and Steven A. Thomas, Howard S. Margulies, Jenkins & Block, a Partnership of Robert Jenkins and Bruce Block, Mark Greenberg, Charlotte Clott, Alisa L. Clott, Defendants-Appellees.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Argued October 2, 1990.
Decided August 22, 1991.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Jan Schneider, Robert Alan Burka, Knopf & Burka, Washington, D.C., argued (Morton A. Sacks, Cable, McDaniel, Bowie & Bond, Baltimore, Md., on brief), for plaintiffs-appellants.
Robert Wilson Hawkins, Ginsburg, Feldman and Bress, Washington, D.C., argued (John C. Grabow, Ginsburg, Feldman and Bress, Washington, D.C., on brief for defendant-appellee Sheikholeslami; Samuel Blibaum, Daniel W. Quasney, Wartzman, Omansky, Blibaum & Simons, Baltimore, Md., on brief, for defendant-appellee Greenberg; Ronald W. Fuchs, Eccleston and Wolf, Baltimore, Md., on brief, for defendant-appellee Margulies; Paul W. Grimm, Terri Lee Reicher, Jordan, Coyne, Savits & Lopata, Baltimore, Md., on brief, for defendant-appellee Jenkins & Block; Kieron F. Quinn, J. Stephen Simms, Quinn, Ward and Kershaw, P.A., Baltimore, Md., on brief, for defendant-appellee Moore, Libowitz & Thomas; Robert B. Schulman, Schulman, Treem, Kaminkow & Gilden, Baltimore, Md., on brief, for defendant-appellee Clott) for defendants-appellees.
Before HALL, PHILLIPS and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
OPINION
MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judge:
The First American Mortgage Corporation (FAMCO) was a substantial enterprise that engaged in multiple frauds. It was ostensibly in the business of originating and servicing second mortgages, and of selling the mortgages and interests in mortgage pools to investors. Often its loans were improper. It misrepresented the nature and safety of its mortgages, and it sold the same mortgages...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.